Skip to main content

How Asia is powering the AI era

Marketing material for professional / institutional / accredited investors only

A year on from their positive note on Emerging Markets (EM) technology, “DeepSeek impact – an evolution, not a revolution”, the GAM Emerging Market Equity team continues to believe that further upside lies ahead. However, selectivity is already important, and becoming increasingly so.

16 February 2026 | Ygal Sebban

While discussions around artificial intelligence (AI) often centre on the US, some of the most critical technological advances enabling the AI boom are increasingly emerging from Asia. The region has become integral to the global AI ecosystem, supported by world-class capabilities in semiconductors, integrated circuit design and a rapidly expanding software landscape.

In our view, EMs offer a powerful way to access this opportunity set. Asia is home to globally competitive leaders across the AI value chain: foundry (TSMC), memory (SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics), integrated circuit (IC) design (MediaTek) and the broader hardware ecosystem, including packaging, testing, IDM and ODM1. Meanwhile, EM home-grown software and application platforms, particularly in China, continue to scale rapidly and present compelling growth prospects, in our view.

The influence of EM tech is increasingly reflected in market representation. The EM tech sector now accounts for 29% of the MSCI EM Index, up from 21% in mid-2023 and 14% in 2018, even surpassing the tech weighting of the MSCI World (26.5%).2 The key upstream hardware leaders – TSMC, SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics together represent nearly 20% of the EM index.

What is shaping the AI and EM tech era?

  • The rapid evolution of generative AI (GenAI) capabilities means the degree of AI’s integration into daily lives is still unknown.
  • Although adopting is at an early stage, “The Economist” estimates that 16% of the global workforce uses GenAI tools monthly3, but it is early in understanding its full impact.
  • With visibility on end applications still limited, we believe sustained growth in AI-related capital expenditure (capex) and model development are likely to support tech performance through 2026.
  • EM Asia is home to many of the world’s leading tech companies with critical roles across both the AI hardware and software ecosystems.
  • China’s top-down AI strategy, driven by low-cost, open-source models, positions the country well for broad economic deployment and long-term productivity gains, though selectivity remains key when identifying private-sector companies best aligned with profitability alongside state goals.

Last year’s concerns around “peak capex” were eased by consistent upgrades. The top four cloud service providers (CSPs) are now expected to spend USD 332 billion in 2025 (up 52% year-on-year), with forecasts for 20%+ growth again in 2026.4 Longer-term projections point to AI investment exceeding USD 1 trillion by 20305, with UBS forecasting USD 1.3 trillion, equivalent to 1% of global GDP (IMF basis) 6. Despite the rapid increase, CSP capex still sits comfortably below operating cashflow, supporting stable and positive free cashflow – a reassuring signal amid “bubble” concerns.

However, while capital-intensity remains in acceptable territory overall, the market is becoming increasingly selective in its exposure. Companies where rising investment implies capex moving ahead of operating cashflow have share price punished - the best example being Oracle (ORCL US), whose shares fell 11% over H2 2025 (versus Nasdaq 100 +11%) after updating spending plans projected capex exceeding operating cashflow on analyst forecasts7, despite a strong AI narrative.

Chart 1: AI Capex - Top 4 CSPs capex relative to operating and free cashflow

 
Source: GAM, JP Morgan, as at November 2025. The views expressed herein are those of the manager and are subject to change. USD bn = USD billion, EBITDA = Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortisation; OCF = Operating Cash Flow; FCF = Free Cash Flow, LHS = left hand side, RHS = right hand side.

Fabrication at the heart of the AI story – TSMC

At its recent Q4 results briefing, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) raised five-year AI growth guidance from 40% to 50%, and 2026 capex guidance to USD 52-56 billion (versus market expectations of around USD 48 billion).8 Chairman and CEO Dr Che-Chia Wei emphasised that discussions extended beyond TSMC's direct customers, revealing tangible business benefits and financial returns from AI adoption. TSMC is aligning its long-term capacity strategy accordingly.

From Generic chips to application-specific silicon – MediaTek

AI is accelerating the shift from generic semiconductors (chips) to application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC). Google’s Gemini 3 models, powered solely by in-house TPUs (tensor processing units) rather than Nvidia GPUs (graphic processing units), illustrate this trend. Asia is home to leading ASIC developers, including Taiwanese company MediaTek, where ASIC-related revenue is expected to overtake legacy handset revenue by 2027.9 With 2026 likely a transition year, we see valuations as supported by current levels ahead of expected ASIC-driven growth from 2027 onwards.10

Architecture over transistors – ASE Technology

For decades, semiconductor progress was driven by one main principle: packing more transistors into a chip meant better performance. As chips moved to smaller nodes, measured by nanometres, and became more densely packed, processing power increased.

At CES (Consumer Electronics Show) 2026 in Las Vegas, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang made clear that the AI bottleneck is shifting from compute to contextual memory and storage, “Moore’s Law11 has largely slowed. The number of transistors we can get year after year can’t possibly keep up with the 10-times-larger models,” he noted, emphasising the strain imposed by long-context inference workloads. Traditional network storage is inefficient for these tasks, prompting Nvidia to redesign its architecture around new “inference context memory” systems.12 As a result, system-level architecture now matters more than transistor density. Performance increasingly depends on advanced memory integration and heterogeneous packaging.

This evolution elevates the importance of companies specialising in advanced packaging and testing. ASE Technology, a Taiwanese global leader in outsourced assembly and test (OSAT) and electronic manufacturing services (EMS), looks well-positioned to benefit from growing industry demand for high-performance heterogeneous integration, alongside tight advanced-packaging capacity at TSMC.

Memory “super cycle” narrative strengthening –SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics

We have been positive on memory since mid-2023 (see Emerging markets: on the path to the industrial revolution 5.0), but the outlook has upgraded significantly since late 2025. Market conviction in a memory “super cycle” has strengthened, particularly for leaders such as SK Hynix13 and Samsung Electronics, as their strategic importance in the AI supply chain continues to expand. Two key developments are reinforcing this narrative.

  1. Broad‑based memory demand
    Throughout the second half of 2025, it became increasingly evident that proliferation of inference-based AI models is driving a broad uplift in memory demand. This includes not only leading-edge high bandwidth memory (HBM) but also legacy DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory) nodes, which remain essential for cost-effective AI deployment at scale. Tight supply across both advanced and legacy nodes has pushed spot prices sharply higher. Several analysts now forecast DRAM shortages extending well into 2027, with the potential to run into early 2028.14

Chart 2: Spot price and contract price of DRAM (DDR4 8GB)

 
Source: GAM, Bloomberg, inSpectrum, as at 8 January 2026.

  1. Memory as the new bottleneck
    The shift in AI workloads towards longer-context inferences has reinforced the fact that memory, not compute, is increasingly becoming the limiting factor in system performance. As highlighted at CES 2026, Jensen Huang has stressed that architectural constraints, rather than pure processing power, are now shaping the pace of AI advancement.15 This transition elevates not only HBM, but also traditionally lower-margin NAND16, as memory moves from a passive cost input to a core performance driver in AI systems.

    Despite surging demand, supply has been slow to adjust. Constraints stem from supply discipline within the DRAM oligopoly (three dominant producers), persistent demand for legacy nodes (which historically would have been migrated to newer ones), and most importantly, a shortage of clean-room capacity across semiconductor equipment suppliers – meaning insufficient specialised facilities and equipment to meet the backlog of orders. As a result, industry backlogs are unlikely to be cleared before late 2027 or even 202817.

Recent industry research indicates that leading Asian memory stocks, including SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics, are being supported by a “stronger-for-longer” industry thesis and upgraded street forecasts for earnings per share and book value18. Should confidence in the memory “super cycle” continue to build, we believe a valuation re-rating could unlock further upside beyond historical trading ranges. For second-tier memory companies, we note that valuations have risen sharply due to retail-driven interest, resulting in less favourable risk-reward characteristics compared with leading names.

Application AI and physical AI – Hesai

A year ago, we highlighted how investment focus in tech had shifted from the very upstream segments towards mid-stream hardware. Early-2026 performance now suggests this momentum is moving even further down the stack, towards software-driven application AI and the rapidly emerging domain of physical-world AI.

At CES, a number of technology majors unveiled new suites of robotics. While some robotics-focused manufacturing companies are trading at high valuations19, attractive opportunities are emerging beyond the obvious thematic names, particularly in the enabling tech that forms the backbone of physical intelligence systems.

One such example is Hesai, a Chinese tech company listed in both the US and, more recently, Hong Kong. As a global leader in LiDAR sensors (light detection and ranging), critical for autonomous driving, robotics and a broad spectrum of physical-AI applications, Hesai represents a classic “pick-and-shovel”20 play, providing essential infrastructure to a rapidly expanding ecosystem.

The risks

There are plenty of concerns about the returns profile and potential bubble characteristics of GenAI. An MIT report from July 2025 estimated that around 95% of GenAI projects are failing21, while valuations across parts of the tech ecosystem continue to look demanding. At the same time, memory shortages are putting pressure on industrial and consumer-electronic producers – especially PC and handset manufacturers – through constrained supply and elevated component pricing negatively effecting both volume and margin.

Stay in the theme, but stay selective

Despite the noise, we believe it is far too early to fade the GenAI theme, while selectivity is essential. In our view, the winners will be businesses with clear leadership or defensive niche positions within the AI value chain, backed by disciplined capital allocation, reasonable valuations and attractive long-term earnings trajectories. We believe established industry leaders within the AI value chain are well placed to participate as adoption accelerates and the technology’s economic impact becomes increasingly evident.

Rob Mumford

Investment Consultant, CFA®
Mon avis

Ygal Sebban

Directeur des investissements
Mon avis

Stratégies en vedette

Equity
Sustainable Emerging Equity

1In semiconductors, an IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer), like Intel or Samsung, handles everything from chip design to manufacturing (with their own fabs) and sales, owning the whole process. In contrast, ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) (more common in electronics, not pure semiconductors) designs and manufactures a product for another company to rebrand (eg, a PC manufacturer making laptops sold as Dell or HP). The key difference: IDMs control the entire semiconductor creation pipeline; ODMs create a whole product, often using components from others, for a brand to sell as their own. (Source: Samsung, “IDM”; SMC Integration Solutions, as at 16 January)
2Source: Bloomberg, as at 31 December 2025.
3Source: The Economist, “Which countries are adopting AI the fastest?”, 26 January 2026.
4Source: JP Morgan, as at November 2025.
5Source: Bloomberg, Reuters, Goldman Sachs, McKinsey, as at 16 January 2026.
6Source: UBS, “What will the new year bring?”, 4 November 2025.
7Source: Bloomberg, as at 31 December 2025.
8Source: Bloomberg, TSMC, “Q4 2025 TSMC Earnings Call”, 15 January 2026.
9Source: Reuters, 31 October 2025.
10Consensus estimates according to Bloomberg for 1 year forward / 2027 Price to earnings ratio of 18.7x is well within the historical range observed from 2020 to 2025. (Source: Bloomberg, as at December 2025)
11Moore’s Law refers to Gordon Moore’s 1965 observation that the number of transistors on an integrated circuit would double roughly every two years, driving decades of improvements in computing power, efficiency and cost. (Source: ASML, “Moore’s Law”)
12Source: NVIDIA Live at CES 2026 With Founder and CEO Jensen Huang, 5 January 2026.
13SK Hynix: 2026 Market Outlook – “Focus on the HBM-Led Memory Supercycle”, 5 January 2026.
14Source: Bloomberg, as at 8 January 2026.
15Source: NVIDIA Live at CES 2026 With Founder and CEO Jensen Huang, 5 January 2026.
16NAND flash memory is a type of non-volatile storage technology that can retain data without a power source. (Source: IMB, “What is NAND flash memory?”)
17Source: Bloomberg, as at 16 January 2026.
18Source: Bloomberg, as at 16 January 2026.
19For example, Hong Kong–listed UBTech (9880 HK), which according to Bloomberg trades on a 2026 forecast enterprise value (EV) to revenue multiple of 22x. (Source: Bloomberg, as at December 2025)
20A pick‑and‑shovel play is an investment strategy that targets the core tools and infrastructure behind an industry rather than its end products — a reference to how sellers of picks and shovels often profited more consistently than the miners during the California Gold Rush.
21Source: Forbes, “MIT Finds 95% Of GenAI Pilots Fail Because Companies Avoid Friction”, 26 August 2025.

Important disclosures and information
The information contained herein is provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as marketing, promotional content or advertising in any jurisdiction. It should not be accessed or used in any jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local laws or regulations. Nothing in this material constitutes investment advice. This material does not constitute a direct offering of any financial instrument, product, or strategy.

References to financial instruments (including specific securities) are provided for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an offer to buy or sell said financial instruments, investment recommendation or investment advice or an invitation to invest in any GAM product or strategy, nor should they be regarded as indicative of future performance. No assurance can be given that any financial instrument referenced will perform as expected or will be profitable. Where specific financial instruments (including specific securities) are referenced, they are selected solely to illustrate the themes discussed and are drawn from the broader universe of instruments monitored by the portfolio managers. Their inclusion does not imply that they are held in any portfolio, nor do they represent recommendations, investment advice, or an invitation to invest in any GAM product or strategy. The portfolio managers may or may not currently hold positions in these financial instruments.

The views and opinions expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and may not necessarily reflect the views of GAM. These views are subject to change without notice, and no liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Neither GAM nor the author(s) shall be liable for any actions taken or decisions made based on the information contained in this material.

This article may contain forward looking statements, including statements relating to objectives, opportunities, market expectations, or future performance. Forward looking statements may be identified by words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “potential,” “planned,” “should,” and similar expressions. Such statements reflect current views only and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements or illustrative examples. No assurance can be given that any views, forecasts, or expectations expressed will occur, and neither GAM nor any of its affiliates undertakes any obligation to update forward looking statements in light of new information or future events. All statements speak as of the date made.

Unless otherwise stated, all information is provided by GAM. Any data obtained from public or third party sources is believed to be reliable; however, its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed.

This article is proprietary and may not be reproduced or distributed, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of GAM. This disclosure shall in no way constitute a waiver or limitation of any rights a person may have under such laws and/or regulations.

In the United Kingdom, this material has been issued and approved by GAM London Ltd, 8 Finsbury Circus, London EC2M 7GB, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA FRM 122330).

The MSCI Emerging Markets Index captures large and mid cap representation across 24 Emerging Markets (EM) countries. With 1,197 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalisation in each country.

References to indices and benchmarks are provided for illustrative purposes only and reflect the performance of broad market segments. Indices are unmanaged, cannot be invested in directly, and do not reflect the deduction of management fees, transaction costs, or other expenses. They are used here solely to describe general market performance and should not be considered indicative of the performance of any investment or financial instrument. There can be no assurance that market conditions or index performance will be replicated in the future.

Contact

Pour vos contacts locaux, veuillez sélectionner votre pays ou visitez notre page Contacts et Emplacements.