Skip to main content

EM Technology

Early summer pullback masks improving fundamentals

Marketing communication for professional / institutional / accredited investors

26 August 2026

  • Technology shares retreated sharply at the start of Q3 2026 following exceptionally strong gains in H1.

  • Key causes included: exceptionally strong year-to-date performance, position concentration and elevated leverage build-up, strategic weighting adjustments, concerns on capital raising, capital expenditure levels and AI returns on investment.

  • Looking through the near-term volatility, industry fundamentals continued to improve, with increased visibility on AI demand, cloud backlogs and increasing confidence in long-term returns on AI investment.

  • We continue to like the exposure to EM tech with positive earnings revisions combined with lower share-prices have left the MSCI Emerging Market (EM) Information Technology Index trading at 25-year valuation lows (on an earnings basis), offsetting the risks around capital expenditure, capital raising and supply-chain cyclicality.

The start of Q3 2026 saw a sharp correction across technology stocks following exceptionally strong gains in H1. During July, the Philadelphia semiconductor index (SOX) fell 21%, while the MSCI Korea Information Technology Index declined 27%.1 Given that the big two memory stocks SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics account for 95% of the Korean information technology index, the sell-off was particular severe, with the index falling 49% from its 19 June peak and 30 July trough. The MSCI Taiwan Information Technology Index was down 14%, although the index-level move understated the weakness in individual stocks given Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company’s (TSMC) 64% weighting and relatively low beta.2

Chart 1: MSCI EM Information Technology Index

 
Source: Bloomberg, as at 18 August 2026.

Several factors contributed to this pullback, although some degree of correction should not have come as a big surprise given the magnitude of the prior year rally. Even after July’s decline, YTD returns at the end of the month remained exceptionally strong, with the SOX up 60%, the MSCI Korea Information technology Index up 63% and the MSCI Taiwan Information Technology Index up 61%.3

We see the recent weakness as a healthy correction rather than a signal of a deteriorating outlook.

Positioning, leverage and funding concerns amplified the pullback

One of the key catalysts for the correction was likely position reductions by large strategic investors at quarter-end as they rebalanced portfolios back to target weights and risk limits. Given the scale of YTD gains, these adjustments may have generated significant selling pressure. Elevated retail participation and leverage further amplified volatility, with margin calls exacerbating the initial sell-off. This was particular evident in Korea, where both single-stock and index-based leveraged ETFs (exchanged traded funds) experienced strong inflows.

While high retail participation and the use of leveraged products have been a broader regional phenomenon, Korea attracted the greatest attention following the launch of several leveraged single-stock ETFs, some offering as much as 10x exposure, on 27 May 2026. According to a Bloomberg markets report, these products attracted approximately USD 9 billion of inflows within two months. At the peak of the market volatility in June, SK Hynix, Samsung Electronics and their associated leveraged ETFs accounted for around 70% of total daily trading activity in the Seoul stock market.

Additional concern centred on the potential impact of large-scale capital raising by both existing companies and forthcoming IPOs (initial public offerings). Several high-profile listings are expected over H2 2026, including potentially OpenAI and Anthropic4, which recently completed funding rounds in the private markets of approximately USD 122 billion5 and USD 65 billion6 respectively, highlighting the substantial financing needs of leading AI developers while IPOs of both OpenAI and Anthropic. A busy pipeline of potential IPOs and follow-on issuance has raised questions about whether equity markets can continue to absorb elevated levels of capital raising without impacting valuations.

In its 4 August 2026 report, SIFMA (Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association) reported that US equity issuance had reached USD 302 billion YTD through July, up 114% year-on-year (YoY)7. Annualising issuance over the January-July period would imply full-year US equity issuance of approximately USD 550-650 billion. A midpoint estimate of USD 600 billion is equivalent to 1.85% of US nominal GDP (versus upper bands of 2.0-2.2% of GDP) and 0.8% of US market capitalisation (elevated peaks levels of 1.6-1.8% in 2021). While elevated, these levels do not appear alarming levels at this point.

Credit issuance form the hyperscalers has also increased, with JP Morgan increasing their 2026 US TMT (Technology, Media and Telecom) corporate credit issuance forecast from USD 450 billion to USD 540 billion, primarily due to increased AI spend. If you annualise the January to July run rate, this implies a full year estimate of total US corporate supply of USD 2.9 trillion, of which AI related issuance is just part of the supply story this year while spreads and credit default swaps levels (CDS) indicate this is being well absorbed.

Despite increased equity and debt issuance to fund AI-related investment, US investment-grade CDS spreads remain near historical lows, suggesting credit markets continue to absorb the additional financing requirements without signs of significant stress.

Chart 2: US investment grade CDS spreads remain near historic lows

 
Source: Bloomberg, as at 18 August 2026.

The emergence of lower-cost frontier models and declining token prices for closed AI models has also contributed to bouts of volatility. However, we believe these concerns are largely misplaced. Lower costs could ultimately accelerate AI adoption, broaden the range of commercial applications and support long-term demand growth across the AI ecosystem.

While these factors contributed to near-term volatility, developments across the AI ecosystem over the summer suggest the underlying fundamental outlook has continued to strengthen.

Hyperscaler demand reinforces confidence across the AI supply chain

While there are certainly risks to monitor, industry developments over the summer, particularly Q2 results from the leading technology and CSPs (cloud service providers) / hyperscalers were highly encouraging.

TSMC management expressed rising confidence in AI demand, with an even more upbeat tone than the previous quarter. Based on customer and end-customer deployment timelines and growth in product roadmap, management are increasingly positive on both current and future sustainability of demand, with visibility now extending into 2029-30. Recent strong order flow led to another upgrade to full year 2026 revenue growth guidance to over 40%, and the firm also a raised its capital expenditure (CapEx) guidance to meet these opportunities.

In the memory space, Samsung Electronics gave an upbeat assessment of demand/supply for memory into end 2028 and gave more specific guidance on the industry trend of locking in long-term contracts for their future output. Jaejune Kim, Executive Vice-President of Memory Business, stated, “The (memory) supply constraints are expected to become even more severe in 2027 than 2026, reinforcing our view that the supply shortage will persist through 2028” and “once we finalise on the currently pending contracts as well, we believe that DRAM8 and NAND9 supply volumes under multi-year supply contracts will easily account for 60% to 70% of our planned capacity, based on our current mid to long-term production plan”.10

SK Hynix management was less specific on timelines but positive on an extended cycle particularly in leading edge product saying “With increasing demand for high performance compute, the company expects demand for premium products such as HBM (high-bandwidth memory), server DRAM and high-capacity eSSDs to continue to grow for an extended period”11

The increasing confidence in the Asian technology hardware supply chain has been reinforced by strong commentary from the US hyperscalers / CSPs (cloud service providers), including Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Microsoft and Meta.

All reported accelerating cloud sales in Q2 2026. Google Cloud, Microsoft CSPAzure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) grew by 82%, 43% and 37% YoY respectively, significantly ahead of the consensus forecasts12. In addition, cloud backlogs surged in Q2 2026, providing further evidence of robust demand. Amazon was a good example: the stock rose 15% on the trading day after the results announcement13, with AWS backlog up by 36% quarter-on-quarter (QoQ)14.

While you might expect a positive bias from these companies, some of the commentary on high performance compute and AI demand was quite effusive. Amazon’s AWS CEO Matt Garman, said the demand being witnessed by the company for AI-related services is “just massive” and commented “We see large training clusters being used by a number of companies, but as these models get really popular and really powerful, more and more companies are integrating that inference into their workloads”15.

Chart 3: Increasing AI usage among US businesses

 
The Ramp AI Index measures the share of US businesses with paid AI subscriptions, based on spending data from more than 70,000 firms. Source: RAMP, as at July 2026.

Strong Calendar Year (CY) 2026 guidance and increasingly constructive commentary on CY 2027 led three of the four major US hyperscalers to raise their CY 2026 CapEx expectations. and 2027 guidance. Consensus cloud CapEx forecasts now approach USD 1.2 trillion, representing approximately 30% YoY growth and, according to JP Morgan, around USD 170 billion more than expected to the prior earnings season.

Chart 4: CapEx forecasts for hyperscalers

 
Source: GAM, Visible Alpha, Morgan Stanley, as at July 2026. Estimates have not been independently verified by GAM. No assurance can be given that such estimates will prove accurate.

Despite higher CapEx plans, management teams expressed greater confidence in 2026 and 2027 return on capital, supported by rising backlogs, multi-year customer commitments, pricing power and efficiency gains. AWS (Amazon Web Services), Azure (Microsoft’s cloud platform), and Google Cloud all see a sizable runway ahead as enterprise AI adoption remains in its early stages and cloud migration continues.

Importantly, management teams consistently referred to supply constraints, with demand from both external cloud customers and internal AI workloads exceeding current capacity. We believe this suggests the industry remains in the early stages of a broader AI infrastructure build-out rather than approaching a cyclical peak.

As an example, Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai stated on the results call, “We are working off a disciplined ROIC (Return on Invested Capital) framework here” and “We are seeing strong demand indicators, including long-term deals, the existing deals which we have, which are renewing at exceptional demand on a moving-forward basis. And so we are using all that to plan and invest accordingly.”

Valuation have become increasingly attractive

The combination of strong earnings, upward revisions to earnings forecasts and the recent share-price pullback has left valuations to trading at or below 25-year lows on an earnings basis, while returns on equity have increased significantly16. Although index valuations are influenced by the large weightings of SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics, the recent correction has returned a number of companies with improving earnings outlook to more attractive valuation levels.

Chart 5: EM technology valuations near multi-decade lows
MSCI EM Information Technology Index forward P/E multiples and return on equity

 
Source: Bloomberg, as at 18 August 2026.

Preferred opportunities within the AI supply chain

Our preferred exposure remains in the upstream segments of the AI supply chain, including foundry, advanced packaging, integrated circuit (IC) design and memory, where oligopolistic industry structures, supply shortage, prudent CapEx outlay and attractive valuations are, in our view, most evident.

The leading Asian memory companies, Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, remain among our high-conviction opportunities. Their focus on DRAM and HBM (High bandwidth memory) positions them well to benefit from continued growth in AI-related demand. In addition to an oligopolistic industry structure, disciplined CapEx plans, strong free cashflow generation and attractive valuations multiples, both companies are increasingly focused on shareholder returns, with current forecasts implying potential attractive yields.

Memory architecture has become a critical enabler of AI implementation. AI applications require much higher memory specifications than traditional computing workloads, driving demand for advanced memory solutions. A good example is that, AI servers require 8-15 times more memory capacity compared to conventional servers.

Although HBM is the key growth driver, broader memory market dynamics remain supportive. As illustrated in the chart below, DDR517 spot prices, one of the indicators we monitor for the broader DRAM market, continue to show resilient pricing, supporting the view that supply-demand conditions remain favourable across memory markets and according to UBS tight demand/supply conditions are expected to persist until Q2 2028.

Chart 6: DDR5 spot prices - Upward momentum indicative of market tightness

 
Source: Bloomberg, as at 20 August 2026.

Based on UBS forecasts, SK Hynix is expected to generate cumulative free cashflow equivalent to approximately 68% of its current market capitalisation between 2026 and 202818 while Samsung Electronics is expected to generate around 75%. Combined with higher visibility on shareholder return policies and (as mentioned above) the increasing use of long-term supply agreements, including contracts extending up to five years, this could present an attractive return profile to shareholders.

Samsung Electronics at their recent Q2 results clarified their shareholder return policy which Mirae Securities estimates could lead their 2026 dividend yield to reach 6.8–9.5% for common shares and 9.1-12.7% for preferred shares. SK Hynix has also recently clarified and upgraded their shareholder return policy, where in addition to a KRW 40 trillion share buyback programme in the coming three months, announced that it plans to return more than 50% of cumulative free cashflow in the current policy period 2025-2027E through both buybacks and dividends, with more details to come around Q3 2026 results.

The investment case remains compelling

As highlighted in our previous article, “How Asia is Powering the AI Era”, we continue to believe the investment case for technology remains compelling. Despite the recent pullback, stronger AI demand visibility, accelerating hyperscaler investment and tight supply conditions continue to support the outlook for selected areas of the AI value chain. Combined with increasingly attractive valuations, these developments reinforce our constructive view.

Ygal Sebban

Investment Director
Approfondimenti

Articoli correlati

Prospettive multi-asset per il secondo trimestre: decollo o inversione di tendenza?

Julian Howard

Una divisione rassicurante: Perché la disparità economica causata dall'intelligenza artificiale non dovrebbe preoccupare gli investitori

Julian Howard

Il proxy voting di GAM: la gestione responsabile in un panorama di governance in evoluzione

Simona Rubino

Opinioni dei gestori

Strategie correlate

Equity
Sustainable Emerging Equity

Sources:
1Source: Bloomberg, as at 31 July 2026.
2Source: Bloomberg, as at 31 July 2026.
3Source: Bloomberg, as at 31 July 2026.
4Source: Bloomberg, as at 31 July 2026.
5Source: OpenAI, OpenAI raises $122 billion to accelerate the next phase of AI, 31 March 2026.
6Source: Anthropic, Anthropic raises $65B in Series H funding at $965B post-money valuation, 28 May 2026.
7Source: SIFMA, US Equity and Related Statistics, 4 August 2026.
8Dynamic random-access memory (dynamic RAM or DRAM) is a type of random-access semiconductor memory that stores each bit of data in a memory cell.
9NAND flash memory is a type of non-volatile storage technology that can retain data without a power source. This type of flash storage is commonly found in devices like USB flash drives, memory cards and solid-state drives (SSDs).
10Source: Samsung Electronics Q2 2026 Earnings Call, 30 July 2026.
11Source: SK Hynix Q2 2026 Earnings Call, 28 July 2026.
12Source: Bloomberg, Q2 2026 Earnings Call, July 2026.
13Source: Bloomberg, 31 July 2026.
14Source: Amazon Q2 2026 Earnings Call, 31 July 2026.
15Source: Bloomberg Tech, 3 August 2026
16Source: Bloomberg, GAM, as at 18 August 2026
17DDR5 is the modern standard for computer system memory (RAM).
18Source: Bloomberg, as at 15 August 2026. Estimates have not been independently verified by GAM. No assurance can be given that such estimates will prove accurate.


Important information and disclosures
The information contained herein is provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as marketing, promotional content or advertising in any jurisdiction. It should not be accessed or used in any jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local laws or regulations.

Nothing in this material constitutes investment advice. This material does not constitute a direct offering of any financial instrument, product, or strategy.

References to financial instruments (including specific securities) are provided for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an offer to buy or sell said financial instruments, investment recommendation or investment advice or an invitation to invest in any GAM product or strategy, nor should they be regarded as indicative of future performance. No assurance can be given that any financial instrument referenced will perform as expected or will be profitable. Where specific financial instruments (including specific securities) are referenced, they are selected solely to illustrate the themes discussed and are drawn from the broader universe of instruments monitored by the portfolio managers. Their inclusion does not imply that they are held in any portfolio, nor do they represent recommendations, investment advice, or an invitation to invest in any GAM product or strategy. The portfolio managers may or may not currently hold positions in these financial instruments.

The views and opinions expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and may not necessarily reflect the views of GAM. These views are subject to change without notice, and no liability is accepted for the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Neither GAM nor the author(s) shall be liable for any actions taken or decisions made based on the information contained in this material.

This article may contain forward looking statements, including statements relating to objectives, opportunities, market expectations, or future performance. Forward looking statements may be identified by words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “potential,” “planned,” “should,” and similar expressions. Such statements reflect current views only and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements or illustrative examples. No assurance can be given that any views, forecasts, or expectations expressed will occur, and neither GAM nor any of its affiliates undertakes any obligation to update forward looking statements in light of new information or future events. All statements speak as of the date made.

Unless otherwise stated, all information is provided by GAM. Any data obtained from public or third party sources is believed to be reliable; however, its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed.

This article is proprietary and may not be reproduced or distributed, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of GAM. This disclosure shall in no way constitute a waiver or limitation of any rights a person may have under such laws and/or regulations.

In Switzerland, this material is communicated by GAM Investment Management (Switzerland) AG, Hardstrasse 201, 8005 Zuerich, regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (‘FINMA’).

Within the EEA, this material is issued by GAM (Luxembourg) S.A., authorised and supervised by the CSSF, and made available solely in countries where GAM (Luxembourg) S.A. has the appropriate authorisations or permissions.

Within the UK, this material has been issued and approved by GAM London Limited, 8 Finsbury Circus, London EC2M 7GB, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FRN 122330).

The MSCI Emerging Markets Index captures large and mid cap representation across 24 Emerging Markets (EM) countries. With 1,178 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country.

The MSCI Emerging Markets Information Technology Index tracks large and mid-cap technology stocks across 21 emerging market countries. It follows the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) and highlights key tech trends, hardware, and software companies in developing global economies.

The MSCI Korea Information Technology Index tracks large and mid-cap South Korean equities within the information technology sector, as classified by the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). It heavily highlights major global tech and memory chip heavyweights like Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix.

The MSCI Taiwan Information Technology Index is a targeted equity index that measures the performance of large- and mid-cap technology stocks within Taiwan’s stock market, classified under the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). Because Taiwan’s broader equity market is heavily dominated by technology, this sector index closely mirrors the primary drivers of the flagship MSCI Taiwan Index, where Information Technology commands roughly 87% of the total weight.

The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (ticker SOX) tracks the 30 largest US-traded companies that design, make, and sell microchips and semiconductor equipment.

References to indices and benchmarks are provided for illustrative purposes only and reflect the performance of broad market segments. Indices are unmanaged, cannot be invested in directly, and do not reflect the deduction of management fees, transaction costs, or other expenses. They are used here solely to describe general market performance and should not be considered indicative of the performance of any investment or financial instrument. There can be no assurance that market conditions or index performance will be replicated in the future.

Contatti

Si rimanda alla pagina Contatti e Sedi.